November 21, 2024

Predicting Training Loss Across Datasets: A New Loss-to-Loss Approach

Listen to this article as Podcast
0:00 / 0:00
Predicting Training Loss Across Datasets: A New Loss-to-Loss Approach
```html

Scaling Laws for All Datasets: Loss-to-Loss Prediction

Scaling laws have been established as a reliable method for predicting training loss across various computational scales for a single data distribution. However, less is known about how these predictions change when the data distribution is adjusted. A recently published paper by Brandfonbrener et al. titled "Loss-to-Loss Prediction: Scaling Laws for All Datasets" investigates this very question and presents a strategy for predicting one loss based on another. This method enables prediction across different pre-training datasets and from pre-training data to downstream task data.

Loss-to-Loss Prediction

The core idea of the paper is loss-to-loss prediction. This methodology allows the prediction of the loss on one data distribution based on the loss on another distribution. This is particularly useful because a scaling law applied to the first loss can be directly translated into a scaling law for the second loss. This opens the possibility of predicting the performance of models on new datasets without having to perform extensive training runs.

Three Types of Loss Relationships

The authors identify three main types of loss relationships:

Train-to-Train: Comparison of the training loss of models trained on two different datasets. With the same compute, a shifted power law emerges that relates the two losses.

Train-to-Test: Transfer from a model trained on one dataset to another dataset. Here, too, a shifted power law emerges, enabling prediction.

Test-to-Test: Comparison of the downstream test loss of models trained on two different training datasets. Similar to Train-to-Train, a shifted power law is observed.

Practical Application and Benefits

Loss-to-loss prediction offers practical advantages. If a scaling law already exists for one dataset, predictions about performance on a new dataset can be made with only a few training runs on the new dataset. The authors show that using data from multiple pre-training datasets can lead to better predictions than fitting independent scaling laws. This saves compute and time, enabling more efficient model development.

Implications for Scaling Laws and Transfer Learning

The results of the paper have far-reaching implications for understanding scaling laws and transfer learning. Loss-to-loss prediction provides insights into the relationship between different data distributions and their influence on model performance. It enables more accurate prediction of model performance on new datasets and can optimize the selection of training data for downstream tasks. The research findings contribute to a better understanding and control of the generalization of models to unknown data.

Conclusion

Loss-to-loss prediction represents a promising method for extending the predictive power of scaling laws and increasing the efficiency of model development. The results presented in the paper offer valuable insights into the behavior of models on different data distributions and open up new possibilities for optimizing training strategies and improving the generalization ability of AI models. For companies like Mindverse, which specialize in the development of AI solutions, these findings are of great importance for developing customized and high-performance AI systems for various application areas.

Bibliography https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12925 https://arxiv.org/html/2411.12925v1 https://twitter.com/StatMLPapers/status/1859462989641924684 https://huggingface.co/papers/2403.08540 https://openreview.net/attachment?id=xGM5shdGJD&name=pdf https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2024/papers/Goyal_Scaling_Laws_for_Data_Filtering--_Data_Curation_cannot_be_Compute_CVPR_2024_paper.pdf https://openreview.net/forum?id=xGM5shdGJD https://petiushko.info/files/20231214_ML4AD2023_Scaling_Laws_Autonomy.pdf https://neuralmagic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/a_constructive_prediction_of_the_generalization_error_across_scales.pdf https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AIES/article/view/31641/33808 ```