Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly permeating our world. From chatbots in customer service to fraud detection and personalized recommendations in e-commerce, AI systems are already part of our everyday lives. This rapid development offers enormous opportunities but also presents companies with new challenges, especially with regard to upcoming regulation.
Worldwide, legislators and regulatory authorities are working to keep pace with the progress of AI. While AI is recognized as a driver of economic growth, there are also concerns about its impact on citizens, society, and the environment. Therefore, adapting existing and creating new regulatory frameworks is essential.
A global consensus on ethical principles for the use of AI, such as the OECD AI Principles, forms the basis for current regulatory efforts. Leading nations and international organizations are working to translate these principles into concrete regulations. The EU, the USA, the UK, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and China have already submitted legislative proposals or comprehensive guidelines.
A central challenge of AI regulation is to find a balance between cross-sectoral basic principles and sector-specific regulations. While the EU AI Act pursues a risk-based approach and classifies AI systems according to their risk potential, the UK relies on a more innovation-friendly, context-specific approach.
Regardless of the approach chosen, companies must act proactively and prepare for regulatory requirements. Implementing robust data governance rules, continuously monitoring AI systems, and conducting risk assessments are crucial steps. Equally important is the establishment of an ethics governance for AI, which ensures transparency, data protection, and compliance with ethical principles.
Generative AI, with its ability to generate text, images, speech, and music, raises new questions for regulation. The previous approaches, which are often tailored to specific tasks, fall short here. A uniform framework for generative AI is difficult to find given its diverse application possibilities.
For companies, this means that they must design their AI governance frameworks flexibly and adapt them to the specifics of generative AI. Continuous monitoring of technological developments and the regulatory landscape is essential.
The regulation of AI is a complex and dynamic field. However, companies should not see uncertainty as a reason to leave the opportunities of AI untapped. By acting proactively, implementing robust governance structures, and considering ethical principles, companies can prepare for the regulatory future and exploit the full potential of AI.
Bibliographie: The Cipher Brief. "Book Review: Preparing Today for Tomorrow’s AI Wars." WPP. "Are marketers prepared for the oncoming world of AI regulation?" EY. "How to make AI of today ready for the regulation of tomorrow." Hogan Lovells. "How to prepare for evolving global AI legislation." EY. "How integrity-first AI use today builds confidence for tomorrow." KPMG. "AI regulations present and future point of view." Info-Tech Research Group. "Prepare for AI regulation." Forbes Technology Council. "AI in the Syllabus: Preparing Tomorrow’s Doctors Today." Greyfly. "Future of AI in Project Management: Preparing for Tomorrow’s Challenges Today."