.png)
December 31, 2024
The rapid development in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has led to a variety of tools and frameworks that facilitate access to and application of large language models (LLMs). Developers often face the decision of whether to use agents, such as those offered by Crewai, or whether direct LLM calls are more efficient. This article highlights the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches and provides an overview of their respective areas of application.
Direct LLM calls offer the most direct and simplest method for interacting with a language model. Developers send prompts directly to the LLM and receive the generated response. This approach offers maximum control over the process and allows for precise control of the model. The simplicity of implementation makes direct calls attractive for specific tasks where complexity should be kept low. However, direct calls reach their limits when more complex tasks need to be handled, requiring multiple steps or access to external resources.
Agents, such as those offered by Crewai, extend the functionality of LLMs by linking them with tools and external resources. An agent can, for example, access databases, execute code, or perform web searches. This enables the automation of complex workflows and the processing of tasks that would not be possible with direct LLM calls. The use of agents simplifies the development of sophisticated AI applications and allows the integration of LLMs into existing systems. However, the use of agents also brings challenges, such as the increased complexity of implementation and the need to carefully design the interaction between the agent and the LLM.
The decision of whether agents or direct LLM calls are the better choice depends on the specific requirements of the respective project. For simple tasks, such as text generation or answering questions, direct calls may be sufficient. For more complex tasks that require access to external resources or the execution of actions, agents offer a powerful solution. Choosing the right approach influences the efficiency, scalability, and maintainability of the AI application.
Development in the field of AI is progressing rapidly, and both agents and direct LLM calls are continuously being further developed. The increasing performance of LLMs and the development of new tools and frameworks will further expand the possibilities for applying AI in various areas. Developers should carefully weigh the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches and choose the path best suited to their specific needs.
Bibliographie: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1chkl62/langchain_vs_llamaindex_vs_crewai_vs_custom_which/ https://x.com/sullyomarr?lang=de https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_KB91zbG3c https://m-ruminer.medium.com/crewai-simple-enough-but-it-once-made-100-api-calls-instead-of-1-0e316da4a25c https://x.com/SullyOmarr/status/1808882602947830229 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jFux2ICDF4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ogFgRfMbIM https://www.linkedin.com/posts/brianmrowe_the-new-databricks-llm-tested-on-azure-vs-activity-7180741932791332865-zO9m